GRC 275 Learning and Discussion Forum

Looks good, Denise! I wasn't sure how the roll-over with the tree on the homepage would work but you done it good. The drop shadows on your gallery images add a nice depth to it and the tree in the background add a nice texture.

Whelp. This is it. My original idea had a background of type and I wanted to have that type be live because I like watching it adjust when the window is resized but after trying that it was very annoying and I couldn't get it to look like the way I wanted it to look like. So, this is what I did inst...

The colors and layout of both work well. Reckon it just depends on which designer you like more.

I really like both. I reckon whichever one you go with will depend on the feel you want to give your site.

errythang looks good. my vote is for the long scrolling site with his art throughout.

Whelp. These are late and incomplete. Rough2 is meant to look like a job application form. I was planning on having a drop down menu in the 'influence name' area then have the rest of info fill in after a name is selected and submitted.

For your landscape layout I prefer rough1. The rainbow gradient of rough2 is too much for me eyeballs. Of your portrait layouts, I prefer the sky blue background. The text is easier to read on it.

I prefer your second design. The amber bars across the top and the left side frame things well and work well with the other colors. I look forward to seeing the hover effect with the tree.

Joe!! Everything looks good but clicking around some stuffs didn't go no place and I really needed to buy some of that what you're selling to get more vitality.

Colors and layout are nice. The 'Contact' form is good. Seeing yours I prolly shoulda done mine like that. I'm sure once it's finished it'll be great.